[Phideaux]

@Gossamer The Wisconsin law covering titling of the vehicle:

342.06  Application for certificate of title.
342.06(1)(1)An application for a certificate of title shall be made to the department upon a form or in an automated format prescribed by it and shall be accompanied by the required fee and any applicable taxes. Information obtained by the department under this subsection shall be provided to the department of revenue for the purposes of administering state taxes and collecting debt. Each application for certificate of title shall include the following information:
342.06 Note NOTE: Sub. (1) (intro.) is affected by 2005 Wis. Acts 25 and 59. The 2 treatments are mutually inconsistent. Sub. (1) (intro.) is shown as affected by the last enacted act, 2005 Wis. Act 59. As affected by 2005 Wis. Act 25, it reads:
Effective date text (1) An application for a certificate of title shall be made to the department upon a form or in an automated format prescribed by it and shall be accompanied by the required fee and any applicable taxes. The department shall provide the information it obtains under this subsection to the department of revenue for the sole purpose of administering state taxes. Each application for certificate of title shall include the following information:
342.06(1)(a)(a) The name and address of the owner.
342.06(1)(b)(b) A description of the vehicle, including make, identification number and any other information or documentation that the department may reasonably require for proper identification of the vehicle or for determination of the mileage of the vehicle as disclosed by prior transferors.
342.06(1)(c)(c) The date of purchase by the applicant, the name and address of the person from whom the vehicle was acquired and the names and addresses of any secured parties in the order of their priority.
342.06(1)(d)(d) If the vehicle is a new vehicle being registered for the first time, the signature of a dealer authorized to sell that new vehicle, the total of the number of tires normally used on the vehicle during its operation on the highways plus the number of any spare tires with which the vehicle is normally equipped and the manufacturer's document of origin. The document of origin shall contain the information specified by the department.
342.06(1)(e)(e) Any further evidence of ownership which may reasonably be required by the department to enable it to determine whether the owner is entitled to a certificate of title and the existence or nonexistence of security interests in the vehicle.
342.06(1)(eg)(eg) Except as provided in par. (eh), if the applicant is an individual, the social security number of the applicant. The department of transportation may not disclose a social security number obtained under this paragraph to any person except to the department of children and families for the sole purpose of administering s. 49.22, to the department of workforce development for the sole purpose of enforcing or administering s. 108.22, to the department of revenue for the purposes of administering state taxes and collecting debt, and to the elections commission for the sole purpose of allowing the chief election officer to comply with the terms of the agreement under s. 6.36 (1) (ae).
342.06(1)(eh)(eh) If the applicant does not have a social security number, a statement made or subscribed under oath or affirmation that the applicant does not have a social security number. The form of the statement shall be prescribed by the department of children and families. A certificate of title that is issued in reliance on a statement submitted under this paragraph is invalid if the statement is false.
342.06(1)(em)(em) Any further evidence which may reasonably be required by the department to enable it to determine whether any of the information specified in s. 342.10 (3) (c) to (h) may be applicable to the vehicle.
342.06(1)(f)(f) If the identification number of the vehicle has been removed, obliterated or altered, or if the original casting has been replaced, or if the vehicle has not been numbered by the manufacturer, the application for certificate of title shall so state. If the identification number of the vehicle was originally based on an engine number and the engine number is no longer pertinent to the vehicle because of subsequent engine changes and no other manufacturer's identification number, chassis number or serial number exists, the department shall assign a new identification number for the vehicle under s. 342.30 (1m).
342.06(1)(g)(g) If the vehicle is a used motor vehicle which was last previously registered in another jurisdiction, the applicant shall furnish any certificate of ownership issued by the other jurisdiction and a statement pertaining to the title history and ownership of such motor vehicle, such statement to be in the form the department prescribes.
342.06(1)(h)(h) If the applicant for certificate of title for a motor vehicle intends to utilize that vehicle as a taxicab or for public transportation, the applicant shall state that fact in the application. If the applicant knows that the vehicle has previously been used as a taxicab or for public transportation and that fact is not noted on the old certificate of title, the applicant shall state in the application that the vehicle has previously been so used.
342.06(1)(hm)(hm) If the applicant for certificate of title for a motor vehicle intends to utilize that vehicle as a police vehicle by a law enforcement agency, the applicant shall state that fact in the application. If the applicant knows that the vehicle has previously been used as a police vehicle by a law enforcement agency and that fact is not noted on the old certificate of title, the applicant shall state in the application that the vehicle has previously been so used.
342.06(1)(hr)(hr) If the vehicle is less than 7 years old, is damaged by collision or other occurrence to the extent that the estimated or actual cost, whichever is greater, of repairing the vehicle exceeds 30 percent of its fair market value and was transferred to an insurer upon payment of an insurance claim, the insurer shall state that fact in the application. If the applicant knows that the vehicle had been transferred to an insurer upon payment of an insurance claim and that fact is not noted on the old certificate of title, the applicant shall state in the application that the vehicle has previously been so transferred. This paragraph does not apply to salvage vehicles.
342.06(1)(i)(i) The information required under s. 85.103 (2).
342.06(1)(j)(j) For a motor vehicle of a model year less than 10 years old, the certificate of title of the person transferring the title to the applicant or, if applicable, the manufacturer's document of origin; the mileage disclosure statement required under s. 342.155 (1); and, if applicable, the power of attorney required under 15 USC 1988 or rules of the department.
342.06(1)(k)(k) If the vehicle is an automobile, station wagon or motor truck having a registered weight of 8,000 pounds or less and a temporary operation plate has been issued for the vehicle under s. 341.09 (2m) (a) 1. b. or 2., the registration number of the temporary operation plate.
342.06(1m)(1m)On the form or in the automated format for application for a certificate of title, the department may show the fee under s. 342.14 (3m) separately from the fee under s. 342.14 (1) or (3).
342.06(2)(2)Any person who knowingly makes a false statement in an application for a certificate of title is guilty of a Class H felony.
342.06(3)(3)Any person intending to use a vehicle as a taxicab or for public transportation who fails to state such intent in the application for certificate of title or any person who fails to furnish any other information required by sub. (1) (h) may be required to forfeit not more than $1,000.

Section 342.06(1)(g)(g) seems to be what is applicable in your case. The evidence of ownership you need will mostly require some certified legal documentation. If you have the vehicle through inheritance, you will need to get signed affidavits from all inheritors signifying their acknowledgement and release of claim to the bike. Since this was agreed upon by others in your family, then this shouldn't be a huge hurdle. The affidavits will need to be witnessed by a non-involved party. You can then petition a court to issue a judgement of possession for you based on the affidavits. This would be all you need, other than a declaration of value that you can get from any motorcycle dealership that sees the bike.

 

[theshank]

I would hate to live off of his commission check!

I think he was honest and making sure I didn't go down the wrong path.

 

[iabob]

So it’s been three years now. Yep, Polaris can still lick my balls. I also add anyone who thinks I need to get over it to the list of those who can lick my balls

 

[Known1]

Yeah, it still stings without a doubt and will continue to do so for years to come. I know they say time heals all wounds. However the Victory brand was murdered, not wounded.

 

[Poseidon]

So it's been three years now. Yep, Polaris can still lick my balls. I also add anyone who thinks I need to get over it to the list of those who can lick my balls

Hate to be the one to break it to you, but you probably have a better chance of licking your own balls. Just saying...

 

[iabob]

Hate to be the one to break it to you, but you probably have a better chance of licking your own balls. Just saying...

If you hate to be the one to break it to me, then why did you do what you hate to do? And thanks for establishing that you're just saying what you just said.

FWIW if I could lick my own balls, I wouldn't be online posting here.

 

[KeepRidin!]

3 years and the idiots still make the Slingshot.

 

[poptop]

So it's been three years now. Yep, Polaris can still lick my balls. I also add anyone who thinks I need to get over it to the list of those who can lick my balls

Well you old bugger I won,t lick your balls bbut Id have a beer with ya!
Hope you folks out there are doing good !
Hi to all andd take good care

 

[Bujee1]

So it's been three years now. Yep, Polaris can still lick my balls. I also add anyone who thinks I need to get over it to the list of those who can lick my balls

Ok I don't know which is funnier: What you wrote or the visual it depicts.

 

[1 MEAN66]

You mean I can not by Victory oil anymore, any suggestions?

 

[pella cholla]

You mean I can not by Victory oil anymore, any suggestions?

:bigpop:

 

[Known1]

You mean I can not by Victory oil anymore, any suggestions?

Sure you can, I just bought 4 kits off of Amazon. I got two of the kits for $56 because the boxes had some damage and were repaired with packing tape. I wish I had bought 20 kits back when they were blowing them out instead of just 8.

 

[iabob]

Sure you can, I just bought 4 kits off of Amazon. I got two of the kits for $56 because the boxes had some damage and were repaired with packing tape. I wish I had bought 20 kits back when they were blowing them out instead of just 8.

I thought about doing just that, but then I thought, "screw that company, they can lick my balls". So I spent the money on a K&P reusable filter instead (and it's really cool too) and now I just buy Spector or amsoil or lots of other choices.

Oil thread ACTIVATE! Lol.

 

[Known1]

I thought about doing just that, but then I thought, "screw that company, they can lick my balls". So I spent the money on a K&P reusable filter instead (and it's really cool too) and now I just buy Spector or amsoil or lots of other choices.

Oil thread ACTIVATE! Lol.

I own a K&P filter as well. Once I can no longer find the kits I'll switch over to using it again. I haven't used my K&P since they stopped offering Victory oil by the large 5 or 6 quart jugs. Right now I find it more economical to buy the kits than it is to buy Spectro and use my K&P. Personally I do not believe you save much with the K&P filter these days anyway. I was using about 1/3 - 1/2 can of brake cleaner at every oil change to clean the filter out. I was saving a bunch when I could buy the huge jugs of Victory oil and use the K&P, but that's no longer an option.

The Victory kits that I'm buying are not coming directly from Polaris, which makes me feel a bit better about buying them. I hear ya though, Polaris is the original source. I did email Lube Tech last year and asked if I could buy the kits directly from them and pick them up at their facility via will call. (Since they are here in MN). They told me no, I need to order the oil through a dealer.

 

[BP6666VR]

I thought about doing just that, but then I thought, "screw that company, they can lick my balls". So I spent the money on a K&P reusable filter instead (and it's really cool too) and now I just buy Spector or amsoil or lots of other choices.

Oil thread ACTIVATE! Lol.

I disagree......

So I assist....

@slickvic

Now I agree "oil thread activated" haaaaaaaAa

I use Spectro golden 4
20W50

And a HONDA CAR FILTER

 

[Max Hayes]

Damn !....every time I look @ my XR , or a pic of another.....I get pissed.

The platform of the XR is my favorite. Just a good basicmotorcycle , naked with a nice set of bags, and a w/shield. Not all gadgeted?...up. I don't bash other brands, so I won't but. For me Victory got it right ....and now they are no more..damn sad.

If I were younger I'd be tempted to buy another just for spare parts down the road. But I'm nearing the end of my riding so....

I did some checking and it seems [depending on where ya look] their value has dropped like a rock. No surprise really. How many want an outta-production motorcycle? {Think Gilroy , the RockHill Indians} ?

Maybe some day way down the road they will achieve collector status?...and acquire some value then?

Well I think Riders specially like you are already gold in such category if you know have been riding for quite a long time now, and there is no need to be a collector even after a decade or so.

 

[iabob]

Well it’s been four years today. Not a single dollar of mine has gone to Polaris and they can still lick my balls.

 

[Chattanooga_Mark]

Thankfully the two main culprits are gone from Polaris Indian. But sadly, there doesn’t seem to be anyone left at Polaris Indian with an original thought or an original idea. Their ‘design team’ has been gone for a while now.

All this continues to make me more and more thankful to have my CCT.

 

[slickvic]

Thankfully the two main culprits are gone from Polaris Indian. But sadly, there doesn't seem to be anyone left at Polaris Indian with an original thought or an original idea. Their 'design team' has been gone for a while now.

All this continues to make me more and more thankful to have my CCT.

Besides Wino ..... who else is gone ? Steve Menetto ? Mike Song ?

 

[iabob]

Besides Wino ..... who else is gone ? Steve Menetto ? Mike Song ?

Mennetto was moved to four wheelers or something else, Wine resigned to work for Cat or something like that. Good riddance to both.