Ok. This is the first time i seen that you would leave it alone. Lets see, and thank you.
SO FOR STARTERS,, YES I HAVE WON 2 CASES. And i dont think there is any other way to explain the defendant not showing up, and it still gets dismissed. The urgency of the court is to make sure there is no record of someone doing this because it would be a HUGE loss of revenue.
AND SO YOU UNDERSTAND THE LADDER OF AUTHORITY,
The Constitution is the supreme law of the land and anything that goes against it is null and void of law. The cops and the judges, And the government have all sworn an oath to defend the Constitution and protect our rights. Believe it or not its true. Hard to tell most of the time,and this is what is handled by stating Supreme Court rulings.
Statutes and Codes ARE NOT LAWS. They are statutes and codes. Pretty simple. America is a republic, and statutes and codes dont apply to the People of a Republic. You might not want to tell the judge that, but if you do, just let him yell and dont say anything and then the court moves on. He cant say your in contempt if your speaking the truth and its just to let him know you have a grip on him. Important things are definitions and yes Supreme Court Rulings. They cant say the Supreme Court is full of people that just flap their gums, so they hold water in all cases of that subject. And you are not an attorney so your paperwork doesnt have to be done correctly. You dont need punctuation. They have to judge by your substance and its not English class.
THE IMPORTANCE OF SUPREME COURT RULINGS.
Supreme court does not usually interfere with the functioning of the Union or State. This is guaranteed by the principle of Separation of Powers. However, the court has the right to Judicial review which is used to control the legislative powers of the Government. Judicial review is the judiciary reviews the actions of legislative and executive .The courts with judicial review power annul the acts of the state when it finds them incompatible with the terms of a written constitution.
Judicial review is a process under which executive, legislative and administrative actions are subject to review by the judiciary. A court with authority for judicial review may invalidate laws, acts …
Judicial review is central to protecting individuals against state power and has a very real impact on the lives of some of the most vulnerable in society.
Judicial review allows the Supreme Court to take an active role in ensuring that the other branches of government abide by the constitution.
Judicial review empowers the Supreme Court within the system of checks and balances by giving the Supreme Court the authority to check the legislative and executive branches.
FAIR ENOUGH TO CONSIDER IT PROOF.
Ready? GO.
From the United States Code,
View attachment 638317
AND used for commercial purposes means IT MUST BE used for commercial purposes, such as a company vehicle, a taxi cab, a semi, tow truck,, BUSINESS.
If it isnt, THEN ITS NOT A MOTOR VEHICLE.
You dont say "Im taking my motor vehicle to the store."
And you dont say, "Im going to DRIVE the country" when going on vacation. You say "TRAVEL".
Now the sneaky way the Motor Vehicle Code book defines a motor vehicle is by whether or not its "of type required to be registered".
View attachment 638318
HOW CAN YOU ARGUE IT WHEN THE MOTOR VEHICLE CODE BOOK ITSELF TELLS YOU THIS ???
Its apples and oranges.
THAT JUST THREW THE ENTIRE VEHICLE CODE BOOK OUT THE WINDOW !!!
Wham Bam Thank you ma'am..
Want more? Sure. OK
There is an error on the ticket. The cop checks TRAFFIC, but then checks NON-COMMERCIAL. They are the same thing.
View attachment 638319
Its BUSINESS COURT, COMMERCIAL COURT, YOU ARE NOT A BUSINESS.
Your drivers license is ONLY for when your working.
View attachment 638320
One "EMPLOYED" in condu.....
Subtle word games.
View attachment 638321
Under contract. Business.
View attachment 638322
Key word is "CARRIER".
View attachment 638323
For a fee, brings us back to Commerce,,BUSINESS.
DO YOU SEE A TREND HERE??
Its all really self explanatory dont you think??
View attachment 638324
THERES THAT WORD "TRANSPORT" AGAIN.
View attachment 638325
By now the only thing you've got for an argument is, "yeah well try that in court".
I did. It works.
This is your reason for CHALLENGING THE JURISDICTION OF THE COURT.
They obviously have no grounds for what they are doing, AND ITS CALLED CORRUPTION.
To fight the corruption, you need Supreme Court rulings, AND to make sure your STATUS is in the record.
You would think your status is that of a free man, being an American and all. I mean, how many Americans have risked their lives, or given their lives for these rights THAT WE APPRECIATE SO WELL, as to not just give them away.
Argue that.
But the corruption has converted your status to that of a dead man or a corporation.Something that has NO RIGHTS.
You wonder why they want our guns?
And a corporation cant use Common Law. It uses the U.C.C. Uniform Commercial Code, law of the sea, not of the land.
Do you remember old man Bush saying, "We have a chance at a New World Order. One that rules by the law of man, not the law of the jungle" ?? He was saying they were gonna do away with the Constitution,,THE LAW OF THE LAND, He just called it a jungle so the sheeple wouldnt catch it. And they didnt. They just clapped like good sheeple do.
They changed you into Capital, business, and when the judge calls the name of his roster, he stares at it. Because it is written in ALL CAPITAL LETTERS, because you are Capital when you stand up and say "HERE", you just agreed to being that name. YOU JUST WAVED ALL YOUR RIGHTS, and now they have jurisdiction over you in their Maritime Commercial Court.
Never tell them your name. When they ask, you say, " I am here by Special Appearance , in proper person, speaking for the named defendant. I am not a U.S. citizen, but an American National. A flesh and blood , breathing man of the land. I travel by the Common Law. Article 4 Section 4 of the Constitution guarantees me a Republican form of government, and I invoke that into this court and I set my court. At this time I would like to challenge the jurisdiction of this court because it has none over me and I do not intend to give it to you.
You have just converted the court to Common Law, and set your status back to a free man.
View attachment 638326